Thursday, April 2, 2009

Review: Late Night with Jimmy Fallon

A while back, NBC announced that Conan O'Brien would be leaving his show and taking over Leno's time slot. Of course I was sad to see my favorite late night host say good bye (even though he is coming back in June), but I was very optimistic when I heard that the new host would be Jimmy Fallon. I've enjoyed his work on Saturday Night Live, so I was rooting for him to be a success.
.
I decided to give him some time to work out the kinks and find a comfort level before I ventured an opinion on his talk show career. So I'll give my honest review of each part of his show, the good and the bad (and there's plenty of both).
.
The Band
First of all, I was surprised and delighted that the show took on group "The Roots" as its late night band. The Roots are amazing, and perfect for the show. It seems that they know how to play virtually anything, an ability which the show's writers have put to the test. In a recent sketch, Fallon went out into the audience, asked an audience member a few basic questions, suggested a musical style for The Roots to play, and in true "Whose Line is it Anyway?" fashion, the band made up a short song on the spot about that audience member. The styles ranged from 80's pop, to reggae, to doo wop.
.
The Monologue
Fallon opens each show with a monologue about current events (as is formulaic for late night hosts to do). The monologues are decent, nothing spectacular. Although Fallon keeps the audience laughing most of the time, when he goes down he goes down hard. I've never seen a host more awkward when a joke fails. One great thing about Conan (forgive me for making the unfair comparison between a host of more than a decade and a n00b) is that a joke that failed was made even funnier than a successful joke because Conan acknowledged that it bombed. I almost preferred when his jokes failed. I think this is something that may change in time as Fallon becomes more comfortable with his audience.
.
Last night, the monologue was delivered by a random asian man with subtitles as he spoke some other language (my American ignorance is showing). No explanation was given for this, and Fallon just casually showed up at the desk as The Roots played him over. It was completely random. The odd thing is, the asian man KILLED! The audience loved him even though the jokes were just the typical current-event monologue that Fallon gives every night. I don't know what that says about Fallon's delivery, but I'm glad he has varied the typical late night formula, even if it is a slight variation.
.
The Sketches
The sketches are hit or miss, drastically. They are either hilarious, or leave me scratching my head, saying "What the f*** was that?" For an example of the latter, last night Fallon talked about Mt. Redoubt in Alaska, which led to a sketch in which a talking volcano under the studio stairs demanded a sacrifice of baked beans, signed baseballs, and a human life. If you think that my description makes no sense, then I've done an adequate job of explaining the sketch itself. It made no sense. I don't understand what the show's writers were thinking on that one, or what they were smoking to think that it would be funny.
.
One thing Fallon does in his sketches that is quite successful is including his audience members. As I mentioned earlier, Fallon does a bit where he goes into the audience and has The Roots play a song about a few audience members. Another sketch Fallon has that works well is "Facebook Status Updates", in which the camera focuses on a specific audience member, then shows what his or her status update would say on Facebook at that moment. According to Fallon's website, more audience participation is planned for future shows, which is an excellent idea judging by the success of such sketches.
.
The Interviews
The interviews are still somewhat awkward. Fallon spends too much time complimenting the guests. I think he is still starstruck, which will, I assume, fade with time. But his interview tactics are a bit odd. He tends to start off with some story where he and the guest interacted on some other occasion. Most of the time the story ends in a "Wasn't that great?" type of comment. In other words, it's a you-had-to-be-there joke. That's not to say Fallon's interviews don't succeed at all. For instance, he had a contest with Glenn Close to see who could stuff the most carrots in their mouth, which was hilarious. His beer pong match with Anna Kournikova was a hit, as well. Kournikova won, no thanks to her underhand tosses. Another problem I have is Fallon's laugh. It's horrible. When a talk show host laughs, it should signal the audience to laugh along with him. But when Fallon laughs, I just have to stop and think, "Oh my God, that is one of the worst laughs I have ever heard". This may not be as legitimate a criticism, since there is really nothing Fallon can do about it, but it still bugs me.
.
Overall, I expect the show to get better, but I would say there are still quite a few glitches to work out. As Fallon becomes more comfortable, I think his ability to recover from bombed jokes and his ability to maintain a decent interview will come more naturally. I expect he will remain a part of my somewhat regular viewing lineup, but I certainly can't wait for Conan to come back.

3 comments:

  1. Your analysis is pretty much dead on. He has his highs, and he has his lows. However, I do think that Fallon's monologue is pretty bad. I realize that he has experience in stand-up comedy, but it just does not show in his monologue. Furthermore, I cannot stand the Facebook sketch. I just don't find it funny at all.

    On the whole, I find myself wondering how long Jimmy will be able to continue. I know his show is still young, but if it keeps at this pace, I just don't see it lasting.

    As for Conan, well, I'm a little worried. By changing to an earlier time-slot, he's inheriting a significantly older audience (more mature, you might say). While I won't say his jokes are immature, they are definitely geared toward a younger audience. If people turn on Conan expecting to see another Leno-esque performer, I'm afraid they're going to be shocked. I wonder how much Conan is going to change his show...

    -Paul

    ReplyDelete
  2. I agree. Jimmy's monologue does not show his true talent. The facebook sketch itself, I would say, is hit or miss. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. But overall I think including the audience is a good idea.

    I see the show lasting for a while. All talk show hosts get better with time. Even Carson Daily, who sucked at first, sucks significantly less than he used to from what I've seen on the rare occasions that I watch his show.

    I also worry about Conan's new show. There were a lot of things he got away with because his show was on later, and his comedy is definitely geared toward a younger audience. I'm not too worried about his inherited older fan base, though. They will still have Leno at an earlier time, and old people were having trouble staying up late enough to watch Leno as it was (so I've heard), so they won't watch Conan if they don't like him. The older audience will still have their Leno and will probably tune in to Letterman if they don't like Conan and still choose to stay up late. I expect his show will have some changes, but he won't be unrecognizable to his long time fans.

    Thanks for reading the review, dude!

    ReplyDelete
  3. How do you really feel, JohnO?

    ReplyDelete